Glenn
16-06-07, 03:39 PM
A lot of Australian timbers used for selfbows have very high mechanical properties which raises some problems to designing a selfbow from these timbers that wont self destruct. Timbers like osage-orange have a very high modulus of rupture on the belly side of the limb of around 177 but only has a modulus of elasticity on the back of the bow of 13, whereas grey ironbark for example has a modulus of rupture of 181 and an elasticity strength of 24. This high elasticity strength will give the bowyer problems but the bowyer has to design a limb that will counteract and at the same time utilise these qualities the timber possesses to add to the performance of the bow and not detract from it.
To counteract the strength of the back from collapsing the belly as the bow is being drawn the bowyer needs to take these mechanical properties into account when designing the limbs of a bow from different species of timber. One limb design does not suit all timbers.
I have found from past experience that when using timbers such as red ironbark and grey ironbark I prefer to use staves that still have sapwood intact as I have found that you can use almost half and even more than half of the limb thickness of sapwood, by doing this I have found that I can considerably reduce the amount of set the bow takes. On one red ironbark selfbow I hunt with I have made it with more sapwood than heartwood and infact I have made the bow with the sapwood coming into the belly of the limb and this bow still shoots well at my draw length of 26” after many years of service and has taken practically no string follow at all. If you don’t have access to staves with sapwood and you have to use floor boards or other stock timber which will be all heartwood you can will still make very good self bows with the right limb design.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v475/Glenn51/autofocus003.jpg
These are some selfbows made from Australian hardwoods by Alan Jones from Kilcoy. Note the very thin tips and the wide limbs from the handle section out. Timbers are yellow stringybark, red ironbark and tallowwood...
For an all heartwood selfbow from Australian hardwoods you would do well to make the belly wider than the back of the bow to resist the forces of the high mechanical properties the back of the bow will exert on the belly. The other problem with Australian hardwoods is their high density. Some of these hardwoods are over 1000 kilos per cubic metre which can mean bad hand jarr if careful attention is not payed to tillering and limb design.
I like to have most of the working part of the limb down near the handle and the last quarter to one third of the limb as it nears the bow tips to be drastically reduced which gives better arrow speed and less hand jarr. The lower two thirds of the limb have the most amount of timber where it is needed. A good hunting bow if it is to shoot heavy hunting arrows will need to bend more down near the handle where it is needed...Glenn...
To counteract the strength of the back from collapsing the belly as the bow is being drawn the bowyer needs to take these mechanical properties into account when designing the limbs of a bow from different species of timber. One limb design does not suit all timbers.
I have found from past experience that when using timbers such as red ironbark and grey ironbark I prefer to use staves that still have sapwood intact as I have found that you can use almost half and even more than half of the limb thickness of sapwood, by doing this I have found that I can considerably reduce the amount of set the bow takes. On one red ironbark selfbow I hunt with I have made it with more sapwood than heartwood and infact I have made the bow with the sapwood coming into the belly of the limb and this bow still shoots well at my draw length of 26” after many years of service and has taken practically no string follow at all. If you don’t have access to staves with sapwood and you have to use floor boards or other stock timber which will be all heartwood you can will still make very good self bows with the right limb design.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v475/Glenn51/autofocus003.jpg
These are some selfbows made from Australian hardwoods by Alan Jones from Kilcoy. Note the very thin tips and the wide limbs from the handle section out. Timbers are yellow stringybark, red ironbark and tallowwood...
For an all heartwood selfbow from Australian hardwoods you would do well to make the belly wider than the back of the bow to resist the forces of the high mechanical properties the back of the bow will exert on the belly. The other problem with Australian hardwoods is their high density. Some of these hardwoods are over 1000 kilos per cubic metre which can mean bad hand jarr if careful attention is not payed to tillering and limb design.
I like to have most of the working part of the limb down near the handle and the last quarter to one third of the limb as it nears the bow tips to be drastically reduced which gives better arrow speed and less hand jarr. The lower two thirds of the limb have the most amount of timber where it is needed. A good hunting bow if it is to shoot heavy hunting arrows will need to bend more down near the handle where it is needed...Glenn...